HIPAA

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. In the spirit of getting back to the basics, a brief reminder of that the one and only “P” in HIPAA represents portability. With the running ‘carrot and the stick’ dialogue about “meaningful use” of EMR and the incentives for its demonstration within the clinic, lets not forget the portability not only of the information but of the patients as well. This portability must mean something to everyone in the clinic every day with every patient. In spite of the hype associated with chasing the “meaningful use” incentive, HIPAA is not just an IT issue with regard to privacy and security of personal health information.

Trust & Success

The trust between the patient and the physician is one that is clear in the clinic. The nature of medical care requires this trust in diagnosis, guidance and treatment for the patient experience to result in any level of success. But what about the trust between the clinical and clerical staff as it relates to the patient experience? What patients know beyond any doubt is that the majority of communications between the clinic and patient will not be with the physician. These people in clerical roles represent the first point of communication in many different circumstances for the patient before, during and after the clinic visit. So the question is, what would it take to build this trust in the clinic?

One issue involves the common problem of clerical staff retention. What toll has turnover taken on the culture in the clinic? It may be as obvious as a ‘feeling’ that people experience from the time that they arrive in the morning to start each work day. Making a transition from ‘tolerance’ to ‘trust’ among colleagues will make a difference for the entire staff and translate directly into the patient experience as well.

Another concern might be the recognition within the office between “helping the patient in any way that I can” versus “helping the patient in the way that he or she needs it.” This level of trust (or tolerance) among the clinical and clerical staff is often manifested in too many unresolved messages and inquiries from patients. If there is any question about where to begin with a measure of patient satisfaction, start here. It may be as simple as a patient saying, “I know the physician cared and my visit was a good one, but when I called to change an appointment or ask a question about my bill I just felt lost in the process.” What staff know in each of their respective roles in the clinic are the common questions that patients, both first time and ongoing, tend to ask. What every staff member needs to know is how to respond to these inquiries based on their training & skill level, and who else to engage when the question or issue is beyond their influence in the clinic.

Recognizing that patient engagement involves the entire clinic staff will make the difference in changing behaviors about what both patient and staff satisfaction represents in the clinic experience. Building trust among the clinical and clerical staff everyday will solidify the confidence every staff member has in being the “face of the clinic” in precisely the way the patient needs.

What would it take?

It’s a question that many people in the clinical setting are asking themselves. For some, it’s a question about how to realize more efficiency or add services to increase the value for patients and profitability for the clinic. For others, it’s a question of how to respond to the minimum requirements set forth in new government standards for electronic personal health information and accessibility for care. Although the question is the same in either case, the difference lies in a view with opportunities and the other with only obstacles.

Capitation and Capitulation

If there is one lesson already learned from the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) discussion it is that finding a niche is a top priority for physicians. In some cases, physicians have demonstrated a real commitment to owning more of the patient’s care by extending the coordination of care provided within their clinics. Whether its adding a surgery center or forming a collaboration of multidisciplinary services, this demonstration of innovation is inspiring amidst such an array of industry pressures including ACO and a myriad of others.

Converging challenges of trying to give more people access to care with flat or declining rates of health insurance coverage represents a threat for some physicians and an opportunity for others. Regardless of the view of this challenge, physicians measuring their financial performance in accordance with their health insurance contracts has never been more critical. So having the technical means to audit the accuracy and timeliness of these (capitated) payments to the physicians represents more innovation and “meaningful use” of electronic medical records and practice management software. It also represents one more important step away from capitulation among some of the other physicians who see no way to overcome the ‘myriad’ of challenges facing the healthcare community.

The patient advocate

It is about Knowing how you can help in the way the patient needs help instead of just Helping in any way that I can. The difference in these responses may seem subtle at first, but consider the confidence in the outcome of each conversation.  For the patient, there is an expectation that is generally defined by:  I have a specific question that someone in the clinic can answer and I want to talk to that person ASAP.  This may be the initial inquiry between the patient and the clinic for service or a subsequent one for some type of follow-up.  For the clinic staff member who receives this inquiry, knowing exactly how to help will represent precisely how well the entire staff is able to coordinate care within the clinic on the patient’s behalf.  Too often, the assumption is that the physician is solely responsible for coordination of care based on their sophisticated knowledge.

Helping in any way that I can leads to the same outcome for both the clinic staff in support roles and the patient – frustration and apathy with the process.  Knowing how to help in the way the patient needs help requires a shared understanding and accountability within the entire clinic staff that begins, but does not end with, the physician.

To be compliant…or not

You may have seen a recent TV commercial for a health insurance provider. As the story goes, the patient is prescribed medications from two different places. Fortunately, the patient calls a nurse at the insurance provider before taking either of the medications. The nurse advised the patient that these two medications could have caused a dangerous interaction. Although I can appreciate this level of service from the insurance provider, I can’t help but wonder how the two physicians in this situation might feel about the patient experience they each provided.

There are a myriad of opportunities to engage patients beyond their encounter in the clinic. When it comes to the strategic use of EMR/PM systems and other information technologies, a good starting point might be to think about what the people at either clinic could have done to capture this conversation with the patient from insurance provider.  Although it may seem like a competitive conversation, it really has more to do with the patient experience beyond that time spent with the physician.  It’s not about tangling up the physician with even more work than he/she already has with patient encounters every day, it’s about engaging all of those supporting staff in the clinic to participate in the coordination of care on behalf of the physician.  It is about a line of communication and meaningful accessibility between the patient and the clinic, not just the physician, to extend the value of that patient encounter as needed.

In touch…with outpatient service

With all of the competitive, financial and regulatory pressures it is understandable how everyone can feel like a number in the healthcare industry. It really doesn’t matter whether you work in the medical practice or require a service of from that same clinic. From within the practice, the pressure of getting a certain number of patients in each day to see each physician can create the feeling of renewing drivers’ licenses.  From the other side of reception desk, getting the most out of the scheduled encounter or asking for the favor of a last minute appointment can leave people wondering what might have been.

There is some real value in getting back to the basics.  When I’m looking at a website to learn more about a particular practice (because that’s the way I found it), I really do care about the qualifications of the physicians when it comes to the quality of care that I can expect. But there is another side to quality of care that all of the other supporting staff provide, and I’d like to know about those people too. Unfortunately, I rarely see any information about those people, even though they are the ones I’ll be talking to every time I call about an appointment, a referral, a question on my Explanation of Benefits, a prescription refill, or a change in my insurance. The primary reason I care about those people is one of accountability. Not only do I expect the person who promises to help me to actually do so, but I’d like to think that the same person will be there to help again if needed in a few months. I really appreciate people who do what they do well, whether they are clinically trained or not.

So how about giving some credit and face time to all of those other people in the clinic too. Maybe it’ll give them another reason to smile the next time I call. If I have to ask for the favor of a last minute appointment, it’s OK to tell me during the call that I’ll probably have to wait at least 2-hours. After all, this really is a favor to me. Finally, it’s also OK to smile when you deliver on these expectations to me because I do appreciate the favor at the last minute.

Health Care Reform

There are several key issues in various states of development that are intended to initiate change in the health care delivery system right now.  Be aware of these developments but also be cautious not to allow the current uncertainty to paralyze your delivery of healthcare within your clinic and community.

New Year’s Resolutions

As we begin our journey into 2012, there is no shortage of change already underway in the delivery of healthcare. The new requirements for HIPAA EDI Version 5010 compliance not only exemplify importance of implementing the appropriate procedures and training the entire staff, but also the increasing importance of strong relationships with strategic partners. The “covered entity” aspect of 5010 is a clear example of not only the due diligence required in working with these partners but the need for a real dialogue as well. As the amount of detail and disclosure continues to increase for patient encounters over the next few years it will only further prove that collaboration in the medical practice will reach a new level. No longer will this coordination just be among the physicians in the context of diagnoses and treatment plans. Collaboration must involve the entire staff and those strategic partners in your community. As your level of accountability continues to grow in this evolution of standards, make a resolution this year to hold each other accountable too with a sustained dialogue.